What are the Benefits of Taking CUET?

The Central Universities Common Entrance Test is a common entrance test that the National Testing Agency conducts for admissions into 45+ central universities in India. All central institutions in India will be required to use the CUET score, which will be administered by the National Testing Agency (NTA), as a standard exam for admission.

The Central University Entrance Test (CUET) is an updated version of the Central University Common Entrance Test (CUCET), and it is now required to be used by all 45 central universities. The new National Education Policy (NEP), which advocates for the necessity of an entrance test for university admissions, was just recently announced. 

In this article, we have highlighted various benefits of taking the CUET exam.

Benefits of the CUET Exam 

There are various benefits of the CUET exam, which are as follows

1. Equal opportunities for all the students 

It is a dream of every student to pursue their education at the top university in India. Although the 12th-grade results were so important, not every student had the same opportunity to apply to their top choice of institution. 

Some colleges fear that the importance and weight of the 12th grade will diminish due to the introduction of a common entrance exam. 

Although this may be the case, it’s probably not. The CUET requires that the CUET marks be given at least 50% of the total weightage. So, universities haven’t announced how much weight they will give to 12th-grade exam scores. As a result, both the 12th-grade grades and the admissions process will be equalized.

2. End to Subjective Bias 

To answer “Why is CUET Important?” the eradication of subjective bias is a resounding answer. It reveals a personal bias. Say, for example, that a high-achieving 12th-grade physics student wishes to enroll in a B.Sc. Physics program, but her scores in biology and chemistry were so low that she was denied admission to the program and the university of her choice. 

In contrast, students can now take an exam centered on their domain subject, which reduces the weightage of the other 12th-grade subjects by a significant amount. There is a fair chance for a student to pursue their interests.

3. Rank Clarity 

Some other exams have been taken in the past which do not show the ranking of the students. There was no mention of students’ ranks in DU’s 12th merit-based admissions, for example. Because of the uproar among students, several ended up switching colleges. 

With the advent of CUET, students will no longer be unsure of their ranks and the universities they are eligible for. Students can focus on getting into the college of their choice because of the CUET ranking, which helps them determine their preferences.

4. End to cut-off Wrestling

Some institutions’ popular cut-off method is coming to an end. Of course, CUET will likely create its rush-hour dimensions, but cut-mayhem off’s will be ended. 

Now, each university will be involved in one common entrance test and will take admissions based on the merit of the CUET in addition to the weightage of the 12th-grade scores. It’s time to prioritize students’ aspirations and provide them with a fair system for college admissions.

5. Achieving Equality for All Educational Institutions

Admissions to undergraduate programs at each university have traditionally been handled by the reputation of the institution in question. Rather than using a cut-off point system, several universities now rely only on entrance exams to admit students. 

Some universities benefited greatly from this approach, while others suffered. With the aim that these discrepancies would be reduced and that each university will have a fair opportunity of admitting students, we have developed a single entrance exam.

6. Reduction of Burden 

Students would save a considerable amount of time and effort if they simply had to take one entry test rather than having to take many entrance tests for numerous central universities, as is currently the case.

An institution like the CUET can help bridge the gap between the many educational boards in the country’s higher education system, which disparate evaluation methods have exacerbated. However, only if the concerns underlying CUET are resolved promptly will a greater degree of equity be infused.

Scroll to Top